My goal reflects the dollar amount to obtain specific equipment that will allow me the capability to take all of my University of Idaho content (and rapidly) edit for the purpose to make an independent docuSERIES on my journey with the University of Idaho Murders.
The end goal would be to help produce and enter my independent docuSERIES into an independent film festival.
I believe that my research (easily over 2,000 hours) has exposed the flip-side of the coin in this case. Special interviews are around the corner and would be a part of the series.
Help a girl dream BIG by being a part of this crowdsourcing/crowdfunding method which is the only way (at this time) we can compete with the big markets - and to expose what the big markets - MSM won’t touch with a ten foot pole!
My research asks the tough questions within our criminal justice system - does the ends justify the means in criminal investigations? (Violating our rights to get the perp at all costs?)
When are our rights disposable? Why are Judges in US courtrooms not wearing a ref’s jersey? That is a neutral jersey vs appearing to the public as if they are an extension or an arm of the prosecution?
How can US citizens believe that the US criminal justice system still honors our right to be seen as an innocent person even after we have been accused of and charged with unlawful acts/crimes by law enforcement?
Why does mainstream media immediately flock to promote the government’s narrative (and now more than ever) with using headlines that label the accused as “Killer/Cold-blooded Killer/Freaks” etc vs. attempting to appear at the very least neutral or heck why not supportive of a US citizen who has pleaded Not Guilty?
Why is it so hard for mainstream to research and vet both sides of an allegation/s? And then use their BIG MONEY RESOURCES to challenge the allegations (ruffling some feathers) by ask tough questions?
What is wrong with being critical of the work product, the timeline, etc of prosecutors and police officers? We do it everyday in all other professional and entertainment fields? We criticize films. We criticize athletes when competing. We criticize chefs. We criticize medicine. We criticize doctors. We criticize politicians. We criticize school districts. We criticize businesses. We criticize tourism.
How come being critical of any of the fields above is highly encouraged by society except for one - and that’s when you are critical of law enforcement - of prosecutors? Why?
Breaking News - law enforcement and members of our criminal justice system are human and have been for centuries - and they make mistakes like the rest of us and are susceptible to human error like the rest of us. How many times have you heard a prosecutor say they made a mistake? A police officer? Very rarely, if ever. But I bet their spouses all feel differently about how often they make mistakes! :)
What is wrong with questioning for the purposes of vetting, learning and understanding? Who is above being questioned on their work in this country? None of us!
Why are big names within mainstream media organizations who cover true crime starting their own “independent” podcasts on YouTube? Is it for the purpose for these major network stars to voice their OWN independent views? Or spread their major networks narrative? Is it greed? Is it Ego?
What does independent journalism look like in 5 years? 10 years? What does independent film making look like in 5-10 years?
Let’s find out! We are never too old to accomplish a dream…
By donating we will give it a go… and on a small budget expose why the University of Idaho Murders plea deal hasn’t answered any questions - and in fact MPD’s police reports (that have since been released in this case) have connected dots that cast doubt on the truthfulness of police officers reports. The mistruths are easily identifiable when you look at the totality of the police reports and you build off of them with the body cameras and other sources law enforcement uses to document its work - besides a typed up report that’s not inclusive of everything and subject to hearsay.
This independent production will expose the investigation that was documented on paper in real time by investigators is NOT the real investigation. Is not the true events of the authors of those reports.
And so ultimately we are left asking ourselves as the consumer of this docuSERIES - how did law enforcement truly come to catch a quadruple murderer? The concept is for YOU to come to your own conclusion with the information that will be presented to you.
There is still a lot of meat left on the bone in Moscow, Idaho. Let’s eat together!
If you are unable to donate but wish to help and be a part of making this journey a reality - then share the link - that would be the way!
The kind act of sharing this link sometimes ends up being worth more than a single financial donation. So please consider spreading this link far and wide so the word of this journey can get out to as many people as possible to achieve the desired outcome which is the completion of an independent docuSERIES that centers around the University of Idaho student murders - the untold timeline!
the working title: THE UNTOLD TIMELINE The University of Idaho Student Murders
