Help a Loving Father Reunite with His Children
Update: Father put on LIFETIME PO against his kids, without a Divorce filed, any threats or harm. Help the kids not be falsely Alienated from their dad and not have to fight the fight by the slippery rules of courts on his own.
There was a SAPCR (without Divorce) hearing that was a mockery of impartiality by the judge, who did not like that both parties were there Pro Se. When father mentioned that a PO she already attempted over a year previous, she skipped the hearing, she said she skipped it because the Sheriff who was to Serve the father the Temporary PO said he would not be able to Serve it before the already reset once hearing new date arrived. But in fact that is a lie, she skipped it on purpose as stated by the Pastor who advised her to leave the home and file the PO, that the Law would not be able to protect her properly so they would just have to take the Law into their own hands and go into hiding secret residence, though the PO was emphatically stated as the Law required thing to do which should mean to Trust and follow through with. Now the filings, including a second PO is in the county that the Pastor got advice from the previous Sheriff of the county the kids are kept in now since the first PO was skipped. The Pastor asked the Sheriff of that county what he should do and it was said he was obligated to report and the first PO in county the pastor took her to initially and was filed there, but then perceived not good enough protection, but now 2nd PO and other case it is in the county where that Sheriff most certainly had many engagements with the current judge who has been on the bench there before even the advising Sheriff's term took place. Now they strenuously seek the courts and PO all the way to the End without skipping hearings and are getting clear bias rulings/comments/opinions by the court. Judge even making personal remarks outside his scope of duties.
So the judge sided with the wife in the extremely short "hearing" that only included him "suggesting" they get counsel, took two descriptions of willingly participated by her in visitation with her and the kids engagements and he turned those in to "could be stalking" (subjective) not "are stalking" (objective). Sent her down to the county investigator and told her "tell them what we have spoken about here." Then 2 days later the investigator contacts the father to tell him an update he asked her for previously, that a PO has been filed and would he like to come get it or wait to be Served. So the judge essentially judged/ruled the (subjective) without due process and coerced/guided the wife to go file the PO. Father immediately filed Emergency Motion to Vacate PO with proof evidence the basis for abuse was already Ruled Out months ago by the state trusted CPS organization. Judge never sets the hearing for that as the Law commands "shall set hearing as soon as possible" but makes father wait for the PO hearing and at that still says nothing about the Vacate that had very much description as to the wife's behavior not actually in fear and the CPS ruling, and when father brings it to attention of the judge he says he has it but hasn't read it. At that hearing the PO is reset for father to prepare Pro Se or get attorney, for 3 weeks later. At that hearing the ADA who is now Free state funded powerful representation for the wife, in private before the hearing when came up 3 weeks later, asks father if he'd sign 2yr Final on the PO. He says "No, I certainly don't want this extended that long." Judge enters and as hearing begins, he still doesn't mention the Vacate, as required to have set hearing for surely would mean required to self initiatedly address it at next opportunity face to face with the one who filed it. ADA calls wife into courtroom as she has been waiting "safely" outside of it, escorted in by a "victims advocate" presuming lady who sits in pews seats for whole hearing and leaves with her too. She is questioned for situation of need for the PO, and early on lies to the ADA that she does Not have a job when in fact she does work from home and has complained many times of how "busy" she is with work that she can't manage consistent phone/video calls with the kids and dad during all the awake hours of the kids. Though the kids keep asking and begging to more than talk to dad but for him to "come to our house", "do you know where we live, you can come here?" ADA asks wife about the "abuse" of the children, and then confirms with her that the state law allows for corporal punishment, and wife agrees, but has no proof in over a year+ minimum time frame, of answering the ADA that the "abuse" only occurs under consequences of disciplinarian actions Once every other month. Vagueness, no specifics applied to each child, just it left vague. Father, pro se, gets to cross examine question the wife. He makes good and uncomfortable for her to answer questions about her perceptions of the fear and their engagements over the many previous months since she went into hiding, and but that their daughter long previously gave dad info to know their new location. So the hiding resulted in no affect, and dad does no threats or harm just because he knew where they were and kept desperately trying to amicably settle the family matter outside the courts that he knows will not be Impartial.
So the ADA changes her official request to the judge for LIFETIME PO rather than the 2yr she asked the father about before,..."but it can be amended" she says. Well so could the 2yr too!, why did the ADA lie and deceive the father of her intent? Then when asked openly why it was Lifetime and not the 2yrs asked of him originally no one would look at him or answer. But the ADA did say, "it can be amended".
Original post.....
In a confusing twist of circumstances, a devoted father finds himself separated from his beloved children due to a misunderstanding and misinformation. Despite being cleared by the police and child protective services, his family remains apart, kept from the truth by harmful coercion and false claims. It also involves a High possibility the children get whisked off to the foreign 3rd world country of the mother without his permission consent, which would make the legal costs and trauma for the children VERY high. Time is of the essence.
Father is heartbroken and is determined to reunite with his four young children (even wife if she will reconcile at some point) , all under the age of seven. Each day without them is a day spent wondering what they're being told and why they cannot be together, even for a simple visit. The children have seen dad in person twice over 10 months time a total of 3hrs, and as the children Screamed and tears at first glance he walking up to meet them, it was clear they are desperate to see and be with dad. They desperately want to be with Dad and have no fear or reservations of him....unless the separation and confusion refused contact abuses their emotions and hearts against him.
Every child deserves the love and presence of a parent who cares deeply for them. This father faces legal battles not of his own making, fighting not to have to go there, and he is fighting not just to clear his name but to restore the loving bond he shares with his children.
The help can make an incredible difference. Donations will go directly towards legal fees and expenses costs as he works tirelessly to correct this injustice and reconcile the whole family as God designed. The support can help bring the children home and end their confusion, replacing it with the warmth of their father's love they had before and all along.
Please consider making a donation today. No contribution is too small, and your generosity can change the course of this family's life, turning a painful separation into a heartfelt reunion.
Thank you for your kindness and willingness to help a father and his children be together once more, and stop the favoritism often leaned against fathers in court.
Thank you, God Bless
